Today, around 6:30 pm (PT), there was an annular solar eclipse in my part of California. You can read the science behind the "ring of fire" just about anywhere. (Here's something quick from Huffington Post Science if you can't stand to wait.) What I'd rather talk about here is the fun you can have with eclipses because I -- at 23-years-old -- just found out about that myself.

My dad and I were outside with the usual eclipse essentials: a homemade pinhole camera and five pairs of polarized sunglasses stacked together like a modern art sculpture. As a result, we could see either a tiny version of the eclipse or a blurry one.

Then, as I was heading inside to assemble the rest of our family, I glimpsed our tree's shadows and wondered out loud, "Do they always look like that?" 

On the pavement, on fences, and neighbor's garages, the leaves of our front yard foliage had transformed into thousands upon thousands of eclipses, scattered about like hole punch refuse on New Year's Eve. (At least that's what my family used for confetti.)

While taking pictures of this, I saw the trees weren't alone. The tips of my hair looked as though they bent back on themselves, my hands looked like claws. This realization prompted my dad and I to begin a giddy session of posing and bending. My dad's hands lost digits while my wrists all but disappeared.

It seems silly now -- it actually felt pretty silly at the time -- but it was a whole new way for us to engage in what we thought was typical front yard astronomy. And it wasn't just new for us. We shared our shadow play with our neighbors, meeting some of them for the first time in the process. That specific part of our eclipse experience is what inspired me to share it with you.

So, welcome to the neighborhood and happy eclipsing!

As a result of my current journalism crash course, I have become semi-obsessed with the idea of objectivity in the media. I believe, like most journalists, that we should do our best to give accurate and fair information. For that reason, I also believe we should make it clear that journalists are not objective, all-knowing pseudo-humans.

Journalists are people too and people are always biased in some way. This should be made more clear for the sake of our readers. For their part, our audience should also make an effort to recognize that everything they read goes through a person (if not multiple people) before it gets to them.

Even when we do our best to be objective, every choice we make -- from what sources we contact, to what quotes we choose -- is affected by our personal preferences.

So, in an effort to put my money where my mouth is, here are some of my personal science-related biases:

I know science is not the same as truth
Scientists (most of them) know this too. That being said, science is also not simple guesswork. The vast majority of scientists put a lot of care into their work and consult time-tested scientific knowledge. Still, sometimes science is wrong. Really coming to terms with this can be uncomfortable but everyone should do it.

I believe in evolution
I was a biological anthropology major in undergraduate. That means I studied human evolution. I believe in the overall Theory of Evolution. However, I also believe that there is a lot of uncertainty in evolutionary science (as in all science) and that it needs to be constantly questioned and readjusted in order for it to improve. If you don't believe me, Google "epigenetics." It was quite a surprise for many hard-core evolutionists.

I believe people are causing climate change
The human race has created truly incredible things over the span of its existence. Much of the time, I can't even wrap my head around how we've gotten where we are. That being said, anyone who sees what we've made should also be able to recognize the grand effect we've have on our planet. Again, like with evolution, there is still a lot of work to be done before we fully understand what's happening to the climate. Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of time in this case and should be putting some serious work into reducing our negative impact on the environment.

I have a serious soft spot for nature
I love plants and animals (but, no, I'm not a vegetarian). The smell of flowers, the unintentional smile of a dog, and the crackle of pine needles beneath my feet all give me immense pleasure. I would choose a park over a shopping mall any day. That being said, I am beginning to accept that one way for us to protect nature is by moving closer together into cities. I don't like it, but it's true.

I support gay rights
The topic of gay rights goes far beyond the realm of science. Regardless of the context, I firmly believe that people should never be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation. I can only hope that our civilization will soon realize how cruel they are being by stigmatizing homosexuality.

If you have any opinions on this topic, please leave me a comment. I would love to hear other people's thoughts about bias in journalism.

Since you are considerate enough to be reading my blog, I'll explain the title to you.

If you're not a journalist, you should know that "TK" means "to come" in journalist jargon. We write this in our drafts as a placeholder for something that we are expecting -- or delusionally determined -- to have in later versions of our story.

An example might be: [TK: quote from Prof. Brown explaining how he feels about this blog.]

I've been told that the misspelling stems from old editing practices. It is said that journalists wanted to make sure that all of the TK's would be removed from their stories before they went to print, so they spelled it "tokum" in order to catch the eye of those human spellcheckers commonly known as editors. (Not that editors are merely human spellcheckers.)

For those of you who have yet to catch the wordplay, "TK" are also my initials.

See what I did there now? Yeah, I'm pretty impressed with myself too.